FEATURES OF LATE CORONARY ARTERY REVASCULARIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Objective. To compare the results of surgical and conservative treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to a medical institution 48 hours after the occurrence of a coronary event.
Materials and methods. The analysis of surgical treatment and postoperative observation of 43 patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted to hospital treatment within 72 to 120 hours from the onset of acute myocardial infarction was performed. All patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 17) included patients who underwent PCI for vital indications due to the presence of one or more emergency conditions in patients. Group 2 (n = 26) included patients who were hospitalized in a stable condition: they had no pain syndrome, life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias; hemodynamic parameters were within normal limits. The patients underwent complex conservative therapy, PCI was recommended on a delayed basis.
Results. Two months after the treatment, higher myocardial functioning indices, and, as a result, better quality of life, were recorded in patients in the surgical treatment group. A greater number of fatal complications were recorded in patients after myocardial revascularization (which is explained, in all likelihood, by the extensive area and depth of damage to the heart muscle), and the number of non-fatal complications prevails in the conservative treatment group.

1. Frolov AA, Kuzmichev KV, Pochinka IG, et al. Effect of late culprit coronary artery revascularization on prognosis of patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction. Russian journal of cardiology. 2020; 25(8): 54-59. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3796.

2. Makarycheva OV, Konovalova EV, Luk’yanova YUV, et al. The main factors, influencing the hospital outcomes and long-term prognosis in latecomers with myocardial infarction with ST elevation. Creative Сardiology. 2020; 14(3): 224-232. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24022/1997-3187-202014-3-224-232.

3. Lukyanova MV, Dushina EV, Barmenkova YuA, et al. The influence of the endovascular intervention timing on the post-infarction period. News of higher educational institutions. The Volga region. Medical sciences. 2019; 2(50): 40-49. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21685/2072-3032-2019-2-4.

4. Solnyshkov S.K. Efficacy of coronary revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction inlate hospitalization. 2012; 17(4): 55-62. (In Russ.)

5. Zhaoxue S, Peng Z, Chen L, et al. Relationships of coronary culprit-plaque characteristics with duration of diabetes mellitus in acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular optical coherence tomography study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019. 18(1): 136. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0944-8.

6. Smit M, Coetzee AR, Lochner A. The Pathophysiology of Myocardial Ischemia and Perioperative Myocardial Infarction // 2020; 34(9): 2501-2512. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.005.

7. Barzyc A, Łysik W, Słyk J, et al. Reperfusion injury as a target for diminishing infarct size. Medical Hypotheses. 2020; 137: 109558. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109558.

8. Rusak T, Gelis L, Miadzvedzeva A, et al. Risk factors of reperfusion injury of the myocardium during endovascular revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome. 2020; 12(5): 639-655. (In Russ.) doi: 10.34883/PI.2020.12.5.003.

9. Komatsu I, Cohen EA, Cohen GN, et al. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edgeto-Edge Repair with the New MitraClip XTR System for Acute Mitral Regurgitation Caused by Papillary Muscle Rupture. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. 2019; 35(11): 1604.e5–1604.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.06.024.

10. Lee KY, Chang K. Understanding Vulnerable Plaques: Current Status and Future Directions. Korean Circ J. 2019. 49(12): 1115-1122. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0211.

11. Erlikh AD. The First Moscow Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry: the results of six-month follow-up. Emergency Cardiology. 2014; 2: 3-9. (In Russ.)

12. Mal GS, Dudka MV, Bushueva OYu. The study of quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease using the sf-36 questionnaire. Good Clinical Practice. 2016; 2: 52-56. (In Russ.)