<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">pirogovestnik</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Национального медико-хирургического центра им. Н.И. Пирогова</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical &amp; Surgical Center</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2072-8255</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2782-3628</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Национальный медико-хирургический Центр им. Н.И. Пирогова</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25881/20728255_2025_20_1_36</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">pirogovestnik-260</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ БЛИЖАЙШИХ И ОТДАЛЕННЫХ РЕЗУЛЬТАТОВ ОТКРЫТЫХ ХИРУРГИЧЕСКИХ ВМЕШАТЕЛЬСТВ ПРИ ПРОТЯЖЕННОЙ ОККЛЮЗИИ ПОВЕРХНОСТНОЙ БЕДРЕННОЙ АРТЕРИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE IMMEDIATE AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF OPEN SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS WITH EXTENDED OCCLUSION OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Жданович</surname><given-names>К. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zhdanovich</surname><given-names>K. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пуздряк</surname><given-names>П. Д.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Puzdryak</surname><given-names>P. D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гусинский</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gusinskiy</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шломин</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shlomin</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кучеренко</surname><given-names>В. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kucherenko</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">krsamko2012@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Фионик</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Fionik</surname><given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Данилова</surname><given-names>Д. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Danilova</surname><given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Арутюнян</surname><given-names>С. О.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Arutyunyan</surname><given-names>S. O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Санкт-Петербург</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>St. Petersburg</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова»;&#13;
СПб ГБУЗ «Городская многопрофильная больница №2»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Almazov National Medical Research Centre;&#13;
Municipal Multi-Specialty Hospital №2</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>СПб ГБУЗ «Городская многопрофильная больница №2»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Municipal Multi-Specialty Hospital №2</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-3"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБУ «НМИЦ им. В.А. Алмазова»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Almazov National Medical Research Centre</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>03</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Жданович К.В., Пуздряк П.Д., Гусинский А.В., Шломин В.В., Кучеренко В.С., Фионик О.В., Данилова Д.А., Арутюнян С.О., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Жданович К.В., Пуздряк П.Д., Гусинский А.В., Шломин В.В., Кучеренко В.С., Фионик О.В., Данилова Д.А., Арутюнян С.О.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zhdanovich K.V., Puzdryak P.D., Gusinskiy A.V., Shlomin V.V., Kucherenko V.S., Fionik O.V., Danilova D.A., Arutyunyan S.O.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://submit.pirogov-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/260">https://submit.pirogov-vestnik.ru/jour/article/view/260</self-uri><abstract><p>Обоснование: В исследовании отражены вопросы стено – окклюзионного поражения бедренно-подколенного сегмента и методы открытого хирургического лечения.Материалы и методы: Проведен анализ результатов открытых операций на бедренно-подколенном сегменте у 141 пациента. Сформированы три группы пациентов: №1 (n = 53) – после петлевой эндартерэктомии (ПЭАЭ), №2 (n = 47) – после аутовенозного бедренно-подколенного шунтирования (БПШ а/в), №3 (n = 41) – после шунтирования синтетическим протезом (БПШ с/п). Срок ретроспективного анализа соответствовал 3, 5 и 10 годам наблюдения.Результаты: Через 3 года ПП у ПЭАЭ и БПШ а/в – 78,4% и 80% соответственно, значительно ниже у БПШ с/п – 60,5% (p = 0,085). ВП составила 86,3%, 88,9%, 76,3% соответственно. Свобода от реинтервенции выше у ПЭАЭ – 54,5%, в группах шунтирующих операций 33,3% и 30,8% соответственно. Процент сохранения конечности 94,1% vs 95,5% в группах ПЭАЭ и БПШ а/в, 81,6% у БПШ с/п (р = 0,02). Общая выживаемость составила 96,2%, 95,7% и 92,7% соответственно. Через 5 лет ПП 43,8% vs 46,3% vs 30,5%. ВП выше в группе БПШ а/в – 70,7%, в сравнении с БПШ с/п и ПЭАЭ – 58,3% и 66,6% соответственно. Свобода от реинтервенции 44,4% vs 27,2% vs 28% соответственно. Показатели сохранения конечности оставались высокими в группах ПЭАЭ и БПШ а/в – 87,5% vs 85%, в группе БПШ с/п – 72,22% (р = 0,075). Выживаемость составила 90,56%, 87,23% и 87,8% соответственно. К 10-ти годам первично проходимых синтетических шунтов зарегистрировано не было. ПП ПЭАЭ и БПШ а/в снизилась до 22,2% и 26,3% соответственно (р = 0,006). ВП 53,3% vs 57,9% vs 41,2% соответственно. Частота сохранения конечности 82,2% vs 76,3% vs 61,8% соответственно (р = 0,058). Самая высокая свобода от реинтервенции у ПЭАЭ (р = 0,091). Выживаемость составила 84,9%, 80,8%, 82,9% соответственно.Заключение: Выявлены преимущества ПЭАЭ в сравнении с шунтирующими операциями, незначительно уступающие БПШ а/в по первичной проходимости, что подтверждает значимость метода в артериальной хирургии и открывает новые возможности для реинтервенций.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Rationale: The research topic reflects the issues of steno-occlusive lesion of the femoral-popliteal segment and methods of surgical treatment.Methods: The results of open operations on the femoral-popliteal segment in 141 patients were analyzed. Three study groups were formed: №1 (n = 53) – after remote endarterectomy (RE), №2 (n = 47) – after vein bypass (VBP), № 3 (n = 41) – after polytetrafluorethylene bypass (PTFE). The period of retrospective analysis corresponded to 3, 5 and 10 years of follow-up.Results: After 3 years, the PP in RE and VBP was 78.4% and 80%, respectively, significantly lower in PTFE – 60,5% (p = 0,085). SP was 86,3%, 88,9%, and 76,3%, respectively. Freedom from reintervation is higher in RE – 54,5%, in bypass surgery groups 33,3% and 30,8%, respectively. The percentage of limb preservation was 94,1% vs 95,5% in the RE and VBP groups, 81,6% in PTFE (p = 0,02). The overall survival rate was 96,2%, 95,7% and 92,7%, respectively. After 5 years, the PP is 43,8% vs 46,3% vs 30,5%. SP is higher in the VBP group – 70,7%, compared with PTFE and RE – 58,3% and 66,6%, respectively. Freedom from reinterpretation is 44,4% vs 27,2% vs 28%, respectively. Limb preservation rates remained high in the RE and VBP groups – 87,5% vs 85%, in the PTFE group – 72,22% (p = 0,075). The survival rate was 90,56%, 87,23% and 87,8%, respectively. By the age of 10, there were no primary passable synthetic shunts. The PP of RE and VBP decreased to 22,2% and 26,3%, respectively (p = 0,006). SP is 53,3% vs 57,9% vs 41,2%, respectively. The frequency of limb preservation is 82,2% vs 76,3% vs 61,8%, respectively (p = 0,058). RE has the highest freedom from reintervation (p = 0,091). The survival rate was 84,9%, 80,8% and 82,9%, respectively.Conclusion: The advantages of the remote endarterectomy have been revealed in comparison with bypass surgery, slightly inferior to vein bypass in primary patency, which confirms the importance of the method in arterial surgery and opens up new opportunities for reintervations.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>бедренно-подколенный сегмент</kwd><kwd>шунтирование</kwd><kwd>петлевая эндартерэктомия</kwd><kwd>аутовена</kwd><kwd>синтетический протез</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>femoral-popliteal segment</kwd><kwd>bypass surgery</kwd><kwd>remote endarterectomy</kwd><kwd>vein</kwd><kwd>polytetrafluorethylene</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, et al. Comparison of global estimates ofprevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1329-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, et al. Comparison of global estimates ofprevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1329-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. TASC II Working Group. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45S: S5-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. TASC II Working Group. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45S: S5-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gisbertz SS. Remote endarterectomy for arterial occlusive disease. Determinants for success. Thesis, University of Utrecht, with a summary in Dutch. Proefschrift. 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gisbertz SS. Remote endarterectomy for arterial occlusive disease. Determinants for success. Thesis, University of Utrecht, with a summary in Dutch. Proefschrift. 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siracuse JJ, Giles KA, Pomposelli FB, Hamdan AD, et al. Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 2012; 55: 1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.128.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siracuse JJ, Giles KA, Pomposelli FB, Hamdan AD, et al. Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 2012; 55: 1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.128.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2745-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688341.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, Amighi J, Mlekusch W, et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2745-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688341.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink M-LEL, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. Editor’s Choice – 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2018; 55(3): 305-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.018.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aboyans V, Ricco JB, Bartelink M-LEL, Björck M, Brodmann M, Cohnert T, et al. Editor’s Choice – 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2018; 55(3): 305-368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.018.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sharrock M, Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA. Vein Versus Prosthetic Graft for Femoropopliteal Bypass Above the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Angiology. 2019; 70(7): 649-661. doi: 10.1177/0003319719826460.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sharrock M, Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA. Vein Versus Prosthetic Graft for Femoropopliteal Bypass Above the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Angiology. 2019; 70(7): 649-661. doi: 10.1177/0003319719826460.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klinkert P, Post P, Breslau P, van Bockel J. Saphenous Vein Versus PTFE for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass. A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2004; 27(4): 357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klinkert P, Post P, Breslau P, van Bockel J. Saphenous Vein Versus PTFE for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass. A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2004; 27(4): 357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017; 135, e726-e779. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017; 135, e726-e779. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adedigba JA, Volk AS, Roach HM. Periprosthetic seroma occurrence after femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Surgical management after failure of nonsurgical measures in relieving symptoms. Vascular. 2021; 29(2): 244-247. doi: 10.1177/1708538120946546.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adedigba JA, Volk AS, Roach HM. Periprosthetic seroma occurrence after femoropopliteal bypass grafting: Surgical management after failure of nonsurgical measures in relieving symptoms. Vascular. 2021; 29(2): 244-247. doi: 10.1177/1708538120946546.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gisbertz SS, Tutein Nolthenius RP, de Borst GJ, van der Laan L et al. Remote Endarterectomy Versus Supragenicular Bypass Surgery for Long Occlusions of the Superficial Femoral Artery: Medium-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial (The REVAS Trial). Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2010; 24(8): 1015-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.03.022.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gisbertz SS, Tutein Nolthenius RP, de Borst GJ, van der Laan L et al. Remote Endarterectomy Versus Supragenicular Bypass Surgery for Long Occlusions of the Superficial Femoral Artery: Medium-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial (The REVAS Trial). Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2010; 24(8): 1015-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.03.022.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rabtsun A, Karpenko A, Zoloev DG, Starodubtsev V et al. Remote Endarterectomy and Lamina Vastoadductoria Dissection Improves Superficial Femoral Artery Biomechanical Behavior during Limb Flexion. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2018; 50: 112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rabtsun A, Karpenko A, Zoloev DG, Starodubtsev V et al. Remote Endarterectomy and Lamina Vastoadductoria Dissection Improves Superficial Femoral Artery Biomechanical Behavior during Limb Flexion. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2018; 50: 112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.12.007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, et al. Bypass surgery for chronic lower limb ischaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; 34(4): CD002000. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd002000.pub.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, et al. Bypass surgery for chronic lower limb ischaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017; 34(4): CD002000. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd002000.pub.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smeets L, Ho GH, Hagenaars T, van den Berg JC, et al. Remote endarterectomy: First choice in surgical treatment of long segmental SFA occlusive disease? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2003; 25(6): 583-589. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1921.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smeets L, Ho GH, Hagenaars T, van den Berg JC, et al. Remote endarterectomy: First choice in surgical treatment of long segmental SFA occlusive disease? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2003; 25(6): 583-589. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1921.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosenthal D, Martin JD, Schubart PJ, et al. Remote superficial femoral artery endarterectomy and distal aSpire stenting: multicenter medium-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40(1): 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.038.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosenthal D, Martin JD, Schubart PJ, et al. Remote superficial femoral artery endarterectomy and distal aSpire stenting: multicenter medium-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40(1): 67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.038.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
